BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
Washington State Bank
Designations: ✓ CDFI-certified
Washington, LA
7 branches across LA
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 2,643 banks in the $100M-$1B peer group nationwide — 1 of 73 in LA.
- Deposits +1.0% year over year ($273.9M on the books).
- Delinquency rate 1.30%.
- Return on assets 1.12%.
- Efficiency ratio 65.29% vs a 64.48% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 82.01% vs a 77.95% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
Washington State Bank has 1 strength but faces 3 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + Net Interest Margin 0.46% above tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Margin Compression: Bottom 19.5% in tier
- - Efficiency Ratio 0.82% above tier average
- - Delinquency Rate 0.38% above tier average
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$309.2M
+1.4% YoY
+1.9% QoQ
|
-$77.4M |
$386.6M
+1.2% YoY
|
$799.3M
+7.8% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
48% |
| Total Loans ? |
$224.6M
-1.3% YoY
+1.0% QoQ
|
-$33.7M |
$258.3M
+1.7% YoY
|
$538.5M
+5.3% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
53% |
| Total Deposits ? |
$273.9M
+1.0% YoY
+2.2% QoQ
|
-$52.8M |
$326.7M
+0.7% YoY
|
$677.9M
+7.3% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
50% |
| Return on Assets ? |
1.12%
-19.3% YoY
-19.3% QoQ
|
-0.20% |
1.32%
+10.8% YoY
|
1.37%
+23.6% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
42% |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
4.44%
+8.5% YoY
+1.3% QoQ
|
+0.46% |
3.99%
+5.0% YoY
|
4.15%
+0.0% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
77% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
65.29%
+1.8% YoY
+2.6% QoQ
|
+0.82% |
64.48%
-3.2% YoY
|
69.40%
-0.9% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
41% |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
1.30%
-57.6% YoY
-14.9% QoQ
|
+0.38% |
0.92%
+15.7% YoY
|
1.53%
+7.9% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
22% |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
82.01%
-2.3% YoY
-1.2% QoQ
|
+4.06% |
77.95%
+1.0% YoY
|
77.15%
-1.0% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
45% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
28.97%
+0.3% YoY
-3.2% QoQ
|
+6.94% |
22.03%
-0.6% YoY
|
24.65%
+0.5% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
79% |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
1.14%
-51.1% YoY
-10.7% QoQ
|
+0.47% |
0.67%
+16.4% YoY
|
1.11%
+4.1% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
17% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
14.96%
+5.3% YoY
-1.3% QoQ
|
-0.95% |
15.91%
+1.4% YoY
|
17.35%
+5.4% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
65% |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.19%
+26.4% YoY
+77.7% QoQ
|
-0.37% |
0.57%
+7.6% YoY
|
0.33%
+19.6% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
47% |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
29.0%
+0.1pp YoY -1.0pp QoQ |
+6.8pp | 22.1% | 24.6% | 22.2% | 79% |
| Brokered Deposits | n/a | n/a | 7.9% | 6.7% | 8.5% | n/a |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
4.8%
-1.7pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-6.7pp | 11.6% | 12.6% | 12.5% | 19% |
| CRE |
47.9%
-0.7pp YoY -0.5pp QoQ |
+8.3pp | 39.5% | 44.9% | 41.4% | 66% |
| 1-4 Family |
32.1%
+1.5pp YoY +0.2pp QoQ |
-0.5pp | 32.6% | 34.2% | 31.3% | 56% |
| Consumer |
6.7%
-0.7pp YoY -0.2pp QoQ |
+2.6pp | 4.1% | 4.2% | 5.0% | 84% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio |
15.0%
+0.8pp YoY -0.2pp QoQ |
-3.9pp | 18.8% | 22.5% | 19.7% | 48% |
| Leverage Ratio |
10.8%
+0.3pp YoY -0.3pp QoQ |
-1.4pp | 12.2% | 13.4% | 12.6% | 46% |
| Total Capital Ratio |
15.9%
+0.4pp YoY -0.3pp QoQ |
-4.0pp | 19.9% | 23.6% | 20.8% | 47% |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
59
+2 (+3.5%) YoY 0 QoQ |
+0 | 58 | 114 | 482 | 62% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$5.2M
-2.1% YoY +1.9% QoQ |
-$2.3M | $7.5M | $6.8M | $8.8M | 18% |
| Branch Count |
7
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
+2 | 4 | 9 | 18 | 75% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days |
0.2%
+0.1pp QoQ |
-0.1pp | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 68% |
| Nonaccrual |
1.1%
-2.0pp YoY -0.4pp QoQ |
+0.1pp | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.0% | 73% |
| Allowance Coverage |
0.73x
+64.5% YoY +8.1% QoQ |
-23.42x | 24.15x | 27.36x | 20.23x | 18% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
0.6%
+0.6pp YoY |
+0.4pp | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 95% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
10.6%
-3.6pp YoY -2.4pp QoQ |
-1.6pp | 12.2% | 12.5% | 11.6% | 40% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
1.6%
-0.3pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.1pp | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 43% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$1.7M
-18.5% YoY — QoQ |
-$852K | $2.6M | $5.1M | $40.4M | 46% |
Get Full Access to Washington State Bank
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (0)
Concerns (1)
Margin Compression
declineProfitability above 0.75% ROA but margins eroding by at least 0.10pp YoY. Something changed - rising costs or falling yields need addressing.
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.