BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
Putnam 1st Mercantile Bank
Cookeville, TN
3 branches across TN
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 2,643 banks in the $100M-$1B peer group nationwide — 1 of 72 in TN.
- Deposits +16.3% year over year ($159.8M on the books).
- Delinquency rate 0.14%.
- Return on assets 1.93%.
- Efficiency ratio 48.42% vs a 64.48% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 91.76% vs a 77.95% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
Putnam 1st Mercantile Bank shows strong momentum with 4 strengths and 16.4% YoY asset growth
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + Profitability Leader: Top 24.0% in tier
- + Net Interest Margin 0.19% above tier average
- + Efficiency Ratio 16.06% below tier average
- + Delinquency Rate 0.78% below tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
No key concerns identified
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$178.9M
+16.4% YoY
+1.3% QoQ
|
-$207.7M |
$386.6M
+1.2% YoY
|
$2.9B
+37.8% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
21% |
| Total Loans ? |
$146.7M
+19.8% YoY
+4.2% QoQ
|
-$111.7M |
$258.3M
+1.7% YoY
|
$2.1B
+37.6% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
34% |
| Total Deposits ? |
$159.8M
+16.3% YoY
+0.9% QoQ
|
-$166.9M |
$326.7M
+0.7% YoY
|
$2.4B
+35.4% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
24% |
| Return on Assets ? |
1.93%
+36.6% YoY
+6.0% QoQ
|
+0.61% |
1.32%
+10.8% YoY
|
1.13%
+12.0% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
Top 14.8% in tier |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
4.18%
+12.2% YoY
+2.3% QoQ
|
+0.19% |
3.99%
+5.0% YoY
|
3.99%
+5.6% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
64% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
48.42%
-15.1% YoY
-2.5% QoQ
|
-16.06% |
64.48%
-3.2% YoY
|
65.40%
-4.8% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
Top 13.8% in tier |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
0.14%
-23.1% YoY
-40.5% QoQ
|
-0.78% |
0.92%
+15.7% YoY
|
0.70%
+6.5% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
71% |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
91.76%
+3.0% YoY
+3.3% QoQ
|
+13.81% |
77.95%
+1.0% YoY
|
81.19%
+2.5% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
23% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
18.92%
-5.7% YoY
-2.0% QoQ
|
-3.11% |
22.03%
-0.6% YoY
|
18.80%
-1.8% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
40% |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
0.11%
-20.9% YoY
-38.8% QoQ
|
-0.56% |
0.67%
+16.4% YoY
|
0.58%
+9.8% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
70% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
11.72%
-7.8% YoY
+0.3% QoQ
|
-4.19% |
15.91%
+1.4% YoY
|
14.06%
-1.8% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
32% |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.18%
-14.4% YoY
+113.8% QoQ
|
-0.39% |
0.57%
+7.6% YoY
|
0.34%
-6.5% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
43% |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
18.9%
-1.2pp YoY -0.4pp QoQ |
-3.2pp | 22.1% | 18.8% | 22.2% | 40% |
| Brokered Deposits |
5.0%
+2.1pp YoY -1.3pp QoQ |
-2.9pp | 7.9% | 9.4% | 8.5% | 52% |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
9.3%
-1.1pp YoY +0.3pp QoQ |
-2.3pp | 11.6% | 10.9% | 12.5% | 48% |
| CRE |
54.8%
+3.4pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
+15.3pp | 39.5% | 42.4% | 41.4% | 78% |
| 1-4 Family |
35.0%
-2.3pp YoY -0.5pp QoQ |
+2.4pp | 32.6% | 39.8% | 31.3% | 61% |
| Consumer |
2.1%
-0.2pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
-2.0pp | 4.1% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 49% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | n/a | n/a | 18.8% | 14.8% | 19.7% | n/a |
| Leverage Ratio |
11.7%
-1.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.4pp | 12.2% | 11.4% | 12.6% | 61% |
| Total Capital Ratio | n/a | n/a | 19.9% | 15.9% | 20.8% | n/a |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
26
-1 (-3.7%) YoY 0 QoQ |
-33 | 58 | 270 | 482 | 21% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$6.9M
+20.9% YoY +1.3% QoQ |
-$637K | $7.5M | $7.1M | $8.8M | 50% |
| Branch Count |
3
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
-2 | 4 | 17 | 18 | 26% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days |
0.1%
0.0pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-0.2pp | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.4% | 57% |
| Nonaccrual | n/a | n/a | 0.9% | 0.7% | 1.0% | n/a |
| Allowance Coverage |
10.76x
+15.5% YoY +52.1% QoQ |
-13.39x | 24.15x | 28.97x | 20.23x | 83% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
0.0%
0.0pp YoY |
-0.1pp | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 67% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
20.4%
+4.7pp YoY +1.1pp QoQ |
+8.2pp | 12.2% | 10.9% | 11.6% | 89% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
2.4%
-0.2pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
+0.6pp | 1.7% | 2.0% | 1.7% | 86% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$1.7M
+53.2% YoY — QoQ |
-$857K | $2.6M | $16.7M | $40.4M | 46% |
Get Full Access to Putnam 1st Mercantile Bank
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (1)
Profitability Leader
growthTop-quartile profitability for peers of this size. Strong fundamentals and operational efficiency.
Concerns (0)
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.