BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
The First National Bank of Louisburg
Louisburg, KS
3 branches across KS
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 2,643 banks in the $100M-$1B peer group nationwide — 1 of 117 in KS.
- Deposits +17.1% year over year ($171.5M on the books).
- Delinquency rate 0.00%.
- Return on assets 1.84%.
- Efficiency ratio 51.70% vs a 64.48% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 74.22% vs a 77.95% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
The First National Bank of Louisburg has 5 strengths but faces 1 concern
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + Profitability Leader: Top 17.8% in tier
- + Delinquency Rate 0.92% below tier average
- + Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share 14.24% above tier average
- + Nonperforming Asset Ratio 0.67% below tier average
- + Efficiency Ratio 12.78% below tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Net Interest Margin 0.14% below tier average
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (KS) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$201.3M
+12.2% YoY
+2.9% QoQ
|
-$185.3M |
$386.6M
+1.2% YoY
|
$513.9M
+7.1% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
27% |
| Total Loans ? |
$127.3M
+18.8% YoY
+6.0% QoQ
|
-$131.1M |
$258.3M
+1.7% YoY
|
$343.7M
+7.8% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
28% |
| Total Deposits ? |
$171.5M
+17.1% YoY
+5.1% QoQ
|
-$155.2M |
$326.7M
+0.7% YoY
|
$426.3M
+7.4% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
27% |
| Return on Assets ? |
1.84%
+59.3% YoY
+7.4% QoQ
|
+0.52% |
1.32%
+10.8% YoY
|
1.56%
+14.6% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
81% |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
3.85%
+27.2% YoY
+4.7% QoQ
|
-0.14% |
3.99%
+5.0% YoY
|
3.99%
+4.5% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
45% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
51.70%
-18.9% YoY
-5.4% QoQ
|
-12.78% |
64.48%
-3.2% YoY
|
60.13%
-4.7% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
80% |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
0.00%
-100.0% YoY
|
-0.92% |
0.92%
+15.7% YoY
|
0.82%
+9.9% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
Top 0.1% in tier |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
74.22%
+1.5% YoY
+0.9% QoQ
|
-3.73% |
77.95%
+1.0% YoY
|
72.94%
+0.4% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
62% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
36.27%
-7.0% YoY
-5.0% QoQ
|
+14.24% |
22.03%
-0.6% YoY
|
22.01%
-1.4% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
Top 8.2% in tier |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
0.00%
-100.0% YoY
|
-0.67% |
0.67%
+16.4% YoY
|
0.53%
+8.8% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
Top 0.1% in tier |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
10.88%
-0.2% YoY
-2.6% QoQ
|
-5.03% |
15.91%
+1.4% YoY
|
17.75%
-1.2% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
22% |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.20%
-1.9% YoY
+93.0% QoQ
|
-0.36% |
0.57%
+7.6% YoY
|
0.59%
-1.1% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
50% |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (KS) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
36.3%
-2.7pp YoY -1.9pp QoQ |
+14.1pp | 22.1% | 22.3% | 22.2% | 92% |
| Brokered Deposits | n/a | n/a | 7.9% | 8.7% | 8.5% | n/a |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (KS) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
7.8%
+4.2pp YoY +0.6pp QoQ |
-3.7pp | 11.6% | 12.6% | 12.5% | 39% |
| CRE |
24.5%
+4.9pp YoY +2.3pp QoQ |
-15.0pp | 39.5% | 28.8% | 41.4% | 26% |
| 1-4 Family |
61.2%
-7.1pp YoY -2.7pp QoQ |
+28.6pp | 32.6% | 26.7% | 31.3% | 91% |
| Consumer |
2.7%
-0.6pp YoY -0.6pp QoQ |
-1.5pp | 4.1% | 4.6% | 5.0% | 56% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (KS) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | n/a | n/a | 18.8% | 23.3% | 19.7% | n/a |
| Leverage Ratio |
10.9%
0.0pp YoY -0.3pp QoQ |
-1.3pp | 12.2% | 12.6% | 12.6% | 48% |
| Total Capital Ratio | n/a | n/a | 19.9% | 24.4% | 20.8% | n/a |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (KS) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
33
+4 (+13.8%) YoY +3 (+10.0%) QoQ |
-26 | 58 | 70 | 482 | 31% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$6.1M
-1.4% YoY -6.5% QoQ |
-$1.4M | $7.5M | $7.1M | $8.8M | 35% |
| Branch Count |
3
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
-2 | 4 | 6 | 18 | 26% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (KS) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days | n/a | n/a | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | n/a |
| Nonaccrual | n/a | n/a | 0.9% | 0.8% | 1.0% | n/a |
| Allowance Coverage | n/a | n/a | 24.15x | 22.44x | 20.23x | n/a |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) | n/a | n/a | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | n/a |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (KS) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
18.4%
+5.7pp YoY +1.4pp QoQ |
+6.2pp | 12.2% | 14.3% | 11.6% | 83% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
1.1%
-0.2pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.6pp | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.7% | 16% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$1.8M
+73.0% YoY — QoQ |
-$771K | $2.6M | $3.7M | $40.4M | 48% |
Get Full Access to The First National Bank of Louisburg
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (1)
Profitability Leader
growthTop-quartile profitability for peers of this size. Strong fundamentals and operational efficiency.
Concerns (0)
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.