BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
BHM Bank
Designations: ✓ Community bank ✓ Minority Depository Institution
Birmingham, AL
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 536 banks in the under $100M peer group nationwide — 1 of 12 in AL.
- Deposits -5.8% year over year ($14.2M on the books).
- Delinquency rate 9.61%.
- Return on assets -3.95%.
- Efficiency ratio 157.87% vs a 119.40% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 73.32% vs a 74.21% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
BHM Bank has 2 strengths but faces 4 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + Non-Interest Income / Assets 0.29% above tier average
- + Net Interest Margin 0.06% above tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Return on Assets 4.94% below tier average
- - Efficiency Ratio 38.47% above tier average
- - Delinquency Rate 8.13% above tier average
- - Nonperforming Asset Ratio 5.24% above tier average
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (AL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$17.4M
-7.7% YoY
-1.8% QoQ
|
-$45.0M |
$62.4M
-0.0% YoY
|
$2.5B
+1.5% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
Bottom 3.4% in tier |
| Total Loans ? |
$10.4M
+0.9% YoY
+10.9% QoQ
|
-$24.4M |
$34.9M
-0.6% YoY
|
$1.6B
+2.8% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
Bottom 11.8% in tier |
| Total Deposits ? |
$14.2M
-5.8% YoY
-1.2% QoQ
|
-$37.4M |
$51.6M
-0.2% YoY
|
$2.1B
+0.3% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
Bottom 6.2% in tier |
| Return on Assets ? |
-3.95%
-322.4% YoY
+33.7% QoQ
|
-4.94% |
1.00%
+3.5% YoY
|
0.89%
-13.0% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
Bottom 2.6% in tier |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
3.97%
-1.5% YoY
+7.9% QoQ
|
+0.06% |
3.91%
+2.3% YoY
|
4.02%
+3.4% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
55% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
157.87%
+93.5% YoY
-42.7% QoQ
|
+38.47% |
119.40%
+49.6% YoY
|
69.53%
+4.0% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
Bottom 3.9% in tier |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
9.61%
-7.4% YoY
-10.2% QoQ
|
+8.13% |
1.48%
+31.8% YoY
|
1.13%
+25.5% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
Bottom 2.1% in tier |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
73.32%
+7.1% YoY
+12.3% QoQ
|
-0.89% |
74.21%
+12.6% YoY
|
67.62%
+0.9% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
40% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
35.42%
-0.1% YoY
+3.6% QoQ
|
+11.93% |
23.49%
+0.6% YoY
|
24.04%
+0.1% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
Top 14.2% in tier |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
6.07%
+1.9% YoY
+1.5% QoQ
|
+5.24% |
0.84%
+23.0% YoY
|
0.74%
+25.2% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
Bottom 1.7% in tier |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
18.69%
-16.8% YoY
-7.5% QoQ
|
-8.44% |
27.13%
+3.0% YoY
|
15.01%
+1.3% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
63% |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
1.67%
-50.9% YoY
|
+0.29% |
1.38%
+6.3% YoY
|
0.35%
-14.4% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
Top 4.1% in tier |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (AL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
35.4%
0.0pp YoY +1.2pp QoQ |
+10.8pp | 24.6% | 24.0% | 22.2% | 85% |
| Brokered Deposits | n/a | n/a | 9.8% | 5.5% | 8.5% | n/a |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (AL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
41.9%
+11.9pp YoY +5.7pp QoQ |
+28.5pp | 13.4% | 16.9% | 12.5% | 97% |
| CRE | n/a | n/a | 25.2% | 43.5% | 41.4% | n/a |
| 1-4 Family |
17.1%
-7.3pp YoY -2.1pp QoQ |
-17.9pp | 35.0% | 30.6% | 31.3% | 32% |
| Consumer |
1.1%
-0.7pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-6.5pp | 7.7% | 5.7% | 5.0% | 13% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (AL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio |
18.7%
-3.8pp YoY -1.5pp QoQ |
-20.0pp | 38.7% | 15.1% | 19.7% | 37% |
| Leverage Ratio |
13.6%
-0.9pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-4.1pp | 17.7% | 13.2% | 12.6% | 59% |
| Total Capital Ratio |
19.8%
-3.9pp YoY -1.6pp QoQ |
-19.9pp | 39.7% | 16.2% | 20.8% | 38% |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (AL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
11
+3 (+37.5%) YoY 0 QoQ |
-1 | 12 | 304 | 482 | 50% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$1.6M
-32.9% YoY -1.8% QoQ |
-$4.6M | $6.2M | $6.9M | $8.8M | 2% |
| Branch Count |
1
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
-1 | 1 | 20 | 18 | 0% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (AL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days | n/a | n/a | 1.0% | 0.2% | 0.4% | n/a |
| Nonaccrual |
9.6%
-0.8pp YoY -1.1pp QoQ |
+7.9pp | 1.7% | 1.2% | 1.0% | 98% |
| Allowance Coverage |
0.14x
-8.6% YoY +0.4% QoQ |
-6.27x | 6.41x | 7.50x | 20.23x | 2% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
0.5%
-0.5pp QoQ |
+0.3pp | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 89% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (AL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
-27.7%
-40.1pp YoY +13.4pp QoQ |
-34.1pp | 6.4% | 10.0% | 11.6% | 2% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
1.5%
-0.1pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
0.0pp | 1.4% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 54% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$-353000.0
-315.2% YoY — QoQ |
-$671K | $317,817 | $17.2M | $40.4M | 5% |
Get Full Access to BHM Bank
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (0)
Concerns (0)
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.