BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
Madison County Community Bank
Madison, FL
2 branches across FL
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 2,643 banks in the $100M-$1B peer group nationwide — 1 of 44 in FL.
- Deposits +7.5% year over year ($196.9M on the books).
- Delinquency rate 0.30%.
- Return on assets 0.83%.
- Efficiency ratio 72.01% vs a 64.48% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 59.13% vs a 77.95% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
Madison County Community Bank has 1 strength but faces 4 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + Delinquency Rate 0.62% below tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Credit Quality Pressure: Bottom 13.4% in tier
- - ROA 0.50% below tier average
- - Net Interest Margin 0.12% below tier average
- - Efficiency Ratio 7.53% above tier average
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (FL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$211.7M
+8.6% YoY
+0.8% QoQ
|
-$174.9M |
$386.6M
+1.2% YoY
|
$4.3B
+7.0% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
29% |
| Total Loans ? |
$116.5M
+18.9% YoY
+8.0% QoQ
|
-$141.9M |
$258.3M
+1.7% YoY
|
$3.0B
+8.2% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
24% |
| Total Deposits ? |
$196.9M
+7.5% YoY
+0.3% QoQ
|
-$129.8M |
$326.7M
+0.7% YoY
|
$3.5B
+7.0% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
34% |
| Return on Assets ? |
0.83%
+7.5% YoY
+11.9% QoQ
|
-0.50% |
1.32%
+10.8% YoY
|
0.62%
-8.3% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
24% |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
3.86%
+4.0% YoY
+2.8% QoQ
|
-0.12% |
3.99%
+5.0% YoY
|
3.70%
+0.5% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
46% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
72.01%
-3.5% YoY
-2.8% QoQ
|
+7.53% |
64.48%
-3.2% YoY
|
199.20%
+161.3% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
25% |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
0.30%
+1.1% YoY
+46.4% QoQ
|
-0.62% |
0.92%
+15.7% YoY
|
0.61%
-2.0% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
57% |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
59.13%
+10.6% YoY
+7.6% QoQ
|
-18.82% |
77.95%
+1.0% YoY
|
72.91%
-1.7% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
84% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
21.85%
+0.4% YoY
+3.3% QoQ
|
-0.18% |
22.03%
-0.6% YoY
|
27.35%
-2.5% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
54% |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
0.18%
+9.1% YoY
+50.4% QoQ
|
-0.49% |
0.67%
+16.4% YoY
|
0.42%
-2.6% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
62% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
13.91%
+3.0% YoY
-2.6% QoQ
|
-2.00% |
15.91%
+1.4% YoY
|
19.50%
+8.2% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
57% |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.31%
-5.0% YoY
+110.4% QoQ
|
-0.25% |
0.57%
+7.6% YoY
|
1.02%
+6.4% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
74% |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (FL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
21.9%
+0.1pp YoY +0.7pp QoQ |
-0.3pp | 22.1% | 27.7% | 22.2% | 54% |
| Brokered Deposits | n/a | n/a | 7.9% | 8.7% | 8.5% | n/a |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (FL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
12.1%
+0.3pp YoY -1.4pp QoQ |
+0.6pp | 11.6% | 12.9% | 12.5% | 64% |
| CRE |
58.3%
-1.3pp YoY +2.0pp QoQ |
+18.7pp | 39.5% | 50.6% | 41.4% | 82% |
| 1-4 Family |
16.5%
+0.1pp YoY -1.7pp QoQ |
-16.1pp | 32.6% | 30.7% | 31.3% | 22% |
| Consumer |
1.5%
-0.2pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-2.6pp | 4.1% | 3.7% | 5.0% | 39% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (FL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio |
13.9%
+0.4pp YoY -0.4pp QoQ |
-4.9pp | 18.8% | 19.8% | 19.7% | 38% |
| Leverage Ratio |
8.4%
-0.1pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-3.8pp | 12.2% | 13.9% | 12.6% | 5% |
| Total Capital Ratio |
15.2%
+0.4pp YoY -0.4pp QoQ |
-4.8pp | 19.9% | 21.1% | 20.8% | 39% |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (FL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
38
+1 (+2.7%) YoY +1 (+2.7%) QoQ |
-21 | 58 | 295 | 482 | 39% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$5.6M
+5.7% YoY -1.8% QoQ |
-$1.9M | $7.5M | $10.3M | $8.8M | 24% |
| Branch Count |
2
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
-3 | 4 | 13 | 18 | 11% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (FL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days | n/a | n/a | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.4% | n/a |
| Nonaccrual |
0.3%
0.0pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
-0.6pp | 0.9% | 0.7% | 1.0% | 38% |
| Allowance Coverage |
4.99x
-7.7% YoY -34.5% QoQ |
-19.17x | 24.15x | 16.62x | 20.23x | 70% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
0.0%
0.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.1pp | 0.1% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 32% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (FL) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
13.4%
-1.7pp YoY +1.4pp QoQ |
+1.3pp | 12.2% | 9.3% | 11.6% | 59% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
1.7%
0.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
0.0pp | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 52% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$858,000
+15.5% YoY — QoQ |
-$1.7M | $2.6M | $25.2M | $40.4M | 22% |
Get Full Access to Madison County Community Bank
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (0)
Concerns (1)
Credit Quality Pressure
riskDelinquencies rising year-over-year. Credit risk is building - underwriting tools or reserves may need attention.
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.