BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
MapleMark Bank
Designations: ✓ Community bank
Tulsa, OK
2 branches across OK · TX
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 885 banks in the $1B-$10B peer group nationwide — 1 of 21 in OK.
- Deposits +1.4% year over year ($837.5M on the books).
- Delinquency rate 0.67%.
- Return on assets 0.22%.
- Efficiency ratio 90.17% vs a 59.73% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 94.61% vs a 85.04% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
MapleMark Bank has 1 strength but faces 4 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + Delinquency Rate 0.19% below tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Liquidity Strain: Bottom 2.2% in tier
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 35.0% in tier
- - Return on Assets 1.17% below tier average
- - Net Interest Margin 0.67% below tier average
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$1.0B
-4.0% YoY
-0.3% QoQ
|
-$1.8B |
$2.8B
-0.6% YoY
|
$1.3B
+6.0% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
Bottom 0.7% in tier |
| Total Loans ? |
$792.3M
-5.5% YoY
+1.3% QoQ
|
-$1.2B |
$2.0B
-0.3% YoY
|
$835.5M
+7.1% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
Bottom 13.8% in tier |
| Total Deposits ? |
$837.5M
+1.4% YoY
+1.4% QoQ
|
-$1.5B |
$2.3B
-0.5% YoY
|
$967.8M
+5.8% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
Bottom 2.9% in tier |
| Return on Assets ? |
0.22%
-42.1% YoY
-18.1% QoQ
|
-1.17% |
1.39%
+17.0% YoY
|
1.35%
+7.7% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
Bottom 3.1% in tier |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
3.20%
+2.1% YoY
-3.7% QoQ
|
-0.67% |
3.87%
+6.2% YoY
|
4.27%
+1.9% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
22% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
90.17%
+7.2% YoY
+4.3% QoQ
|
+30.44% |
59.73%
-12.6% YoY
|
64.81%
-3.0% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
Bottom 1.8% in tier |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
0.67%
+20.2% QoQ
|
-0.19% |
0.87%
+11.7% YoY
|
1.78%
+23.7% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
40% |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
94.61%
-6.8% YoY
-0.1% QoQ
|
+9.58% |
85.04%
-0.1% YoY
|
74.14%
+1.3% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
27% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
17.96%
+1.4% YoY
+4.5% QoQ
|
-3.31% |
21.27%
-1.5% YoY
|
23.91%
-1.8% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
40% |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
0.56%
+825.2% YoY
+20.8% QoQ
|
-0.12% |
0.67%
+11.7% YoY
|
1.24%
+23.1% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
40% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
14.14%
+5.6% YoY
-2.8% QoQ
|
-0.70% |
14.84%
-0.4% YoY
|
14.18%
-3.9% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
66% |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.14%
-4.4% YoY
+120.8% QoQ
|
-0.39% |
0.53%
+2.5% YoY
|
0.31%
-11.7% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
17% |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
18.0%
+0.2pp YoY +0.8pp QoQ |
-3.4pp | 21.4% | 23.9% | 22.2% | 40% |
| Brokered Deposits |
7.5%
0.0pp YoY -1.4pp QoQ |
-1.9pp | 9.5% | 9.7% | 8.5% | 61% |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
31.2%
-3.7pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
+17.2pp | 14.0% | 15.7% | 12.5% | 92% |
| CRE |
43.9%
+1.8pp YoY -1.6pp QoQ |
-6.1pp | 50.0% | 42.0% | 41.4% | 33% |
| 1-4 Family |
25.5%
+1.0pp YoY +1.3pp QoQ |
-0.9pp | 26.4% | 24.0% | 31.3% | 56% |
| Consumer |
0.6%
+0.1pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-4.1pp | 4.7% | 5.6% | 5.0% | 35% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio |
14.1%
+0.8pp YoY -0.4pp QoQ |
-1.5pp | 15.6% | 17.0% | 19.7% | 60% |
| Leverage Ratio |
11.6%
+0.7pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
+0.3pp | 11.3% | 11.7% | 12.6% | 72% |
| Total Capital Ratio |
15.4%
+0.8pp YoY -0.4pp QoQ |
-1.3pp | 16.7% | 18.2% | 20.8% | 62% |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
89
+11 (+14.1%) YoY +7 (+8.5%) QoQ |
-225 | 313 | 150 | 482 | 5% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$11.3M
-15.9% YoY -8.2% QoQ |
+$837K | $10.5M | $6.5M | $8.8M | 74% |
| Branch Count |
2
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
-18 | 20 | 8 | 18 | 5% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days |
0.5%
+0.5pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
+0.4pp | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.4% | 94% |
| Nonaccrual |
0.1%
+0.1pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.7pp | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 14% |
| Allowance Coverage |
1.95x
-94.4% YoY -20.1% QoQ |
-16.76x | 18.71x | 61.99x | 20.23x | 48% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
0.0%
-0.2pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.3pp | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 30% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
1.9%
-1.8pp YoY -0.4pp QoQ |
-10.6pp | 12.6% | 11.9% | 11.6% | 3% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
2.5%
-0.6pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
+0.6pp | 1.9% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 84% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$1.1M
-44.4% YoY — QoQ |
-$18.1M | $19.2M | $8.7M | $40.4M | 2% |
Get Full Access to MapleMark Bank
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (0)
Concerns (2)
Liquidity Strain
riskLoan-to-deposit ratio above 90% - loan demand outpacing deposits. Bumping against liquidity limits, funding solutions needed.
Efficiency Drag
riskEfficiency ratio above 80% - operating costs elevated relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunity.
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.