BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
Gate City Bank
Designations: ✓ Community bank
Fargo, ND
46 branches across ND · MN
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 885 banks in the $1B-$10B peer group nationwide — 1 of 12 in ND.
- Deposits +8.3% year over year ($3.6B on the books).
- Delinquency rate 0.69%.
- Return on assets 0.85%.
- Efficiency ratio 74.56% vs a 59.73% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 82.50% vs a 85.04% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
Gate City Bank has 1 strength but faces 4 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + Delinquency Rate 0.17% below tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Capital Thin: Bottom 33.8% in tier
- - ROA 0.54% below tier average
- - Net Interest Margin 0.17% below tier average
- - Efficiency Ratio 14.84% above tier average
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (ND) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$4.0B
+7.8% YoY
+0.4% QoQ
|
+$1.2B |
$2.8B
-0.6% YoY
|
$1.1B
+6.9% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
81% |
| Total Loans ? |
$3.0B
+1.1% YoY
+1.6% QoQ
|
+$1.0B |
$2.0B
-0.3% YoY
|
$805.2M
+6.2% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
82% |
| Total Deposits ? |
$3.6B
+8.3% YoY
+0.1% QoQ
|
+$1.3B |
$2.3B
-0.5% YoY
|
$922.2M
+5.0% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
83% |
| Return on Assets ? |
0.85%
+75.3% YoY
+3.5% QoQ
|
-0.54% |
1.39%
+17.0% YoY
|
1.44%
+8.8% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
20% |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
3.70%
+11.9% YoY
+2.4% QoQ
|
-0.17% |
3.87%
+6.2% YoY
|
3.79%
+4.3% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
50% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
74.56%
-8.8% YoY
-0.9% QoQ
|
+14.84% |
59.73%
-12.6% YoY
|
59.23%
-3.7% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
Bottom 13.6% in tier |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
0.69%
-4.6% YoY
-4.4% QoQ
|
-0.17% |
0.87%
+11.7% YoY
|
0.86%
+16.6% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
39% |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
82.50%
-6.6% YoY
+1.5% QoQ
|
-2.53% |
85.04%
-0.1% YoY
|
73.82%
-0.7% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
63% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
13.65%
+4.2% YoY
+4.4% QoQ
|
-7.62% |
21.27%
-1.5% YoY
|
21.56%
+2.8% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
22% |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
0.53%
-6.4% YoY
-0.5% QoQ
|
-0.14% |
0.67%
+11.7% YoY
|
0.54%
+8.1% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
41% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
9.85%
+2.1% YoY
+0.3% QoQ
|
-4.99% |
14.84%
-0.4% YoY
|
12.90%
+0.7% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
Bottom 4.5% in tier |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.74%
-10.0% YoY
+98.4% QoQ
|
+0.21% |
0.53%
+2.5% YoY
|
0.22%
-1.4% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
Top 10.2% in tier |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (ND) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
13.7%
+0.5pp YoY +0.6pp QoQ |
-7.7pp | 21.4% | 21.6% | 22.2% | 21% |
| Brokered Deposits |
0.4%
-0.4pp YoY -0.3pp QoQ |
-9.1pp | 9.5% | 6.0% | 8.5% | 9% |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (ND) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
3.8%
+0.3pp YoY +0.4pp QoQ |
-10.2pp | 14.0% | 12.9% | 12.5% | 13% |
| CRE |
18.2%
+3.3pp YoY +0.2pp QoQ |
-31.8pp | 50.0% | 29.0% | 41.4% | 3% |
| 1-4 Family |
58.6%
-1.5pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
+32.1pp | 26.4% | 12.3% | 31.3% | 94% |
| Consumer |
20.1%
-2.1pp YoY -0.5pp QoQ |
+15.4pp | 4.7% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 96% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (ND) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | n/a | n/a | 15.6% | 15.3% | 19.7% | n/a |
| Leverage Ratio |
9.8%
+0.2pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-1.5pp | 11.3% | 10.7% | 12.6% | 32% |
| Total Capital Ratio | n/a | n/a | 16.7% | 16.3% | 20.8% | n/a |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (ND) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
683
+7 (+1.0%) YoY +9 (+1.3%) QoQ |
+369 | 313 | 138 | 482 | 92% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$5.9M
+6.7% YoY -1.0% QoQ |
-$4.6M | $10.5M | $8.3M | $8.8M | 11% |
| Branch Count |
46
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
+26 | 20 | 7 | 18 | 92% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (ND) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days |
0.0%
0.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.1pp | 0.2% | 0.5% | 0.4% | 47% |
| Nonaccrual |
0.7%
0.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.2pp | 0.8% | 0.7% | 1.0% | 61% |
| Allowance Coverage |
1.01x
+9.1% YoY +3.6% QoQ |
-17.70x | 18.71x | 73.79x | 20.23x | 24% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
0.2%
0.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.1pp | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 76% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (ND) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
9.3%
+3.8pp YoY +0.2pp QoQ |
-3.3pp | 12.6% | 16.0% | 11.6% | 28% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
1.2%
-0.2pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.7pp | 1.9% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 10% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$17.0M
+86.6% YoY — QoQ |
-$2.2M | $19.2M | $7.0M | $40.4M | 64% |
Get Full Access to Gate City Bank
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (0)
Concerns (1)
Capital Thin
riskTier 1 capital ratio in the bottom quartile of peers. Capital cushion thin relative to peers - regulator-watching cohort.
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.