BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
Bank of St. Francisville
Designations: ✓ CDFI-certified
Saint Francisville, LA
2 branches across LA
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 2,643 banks in the $100M-$1B peer group nationwide — 1 of 73 in LA.
- Deposits +5.5% year over year ($346.0M on the books).
- Delinquency rate 0.82%.
- Return on assets 1.50%.
- Efficiency ratio 62.90% vs a 64.48% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 86.38% vs a 77.95% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
Bank of St. Francisville has 4 strengths but faces 1 concern
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + ROA 0.18% above tier average
- + Net Interest Margin 0.50% above tier average
- + Efficiency Ratio 1.58% below tier average
- + Delinquency Rate 0.10% below tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Capital Thin: Bottom 32.4% in tier
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$398.7M
+4.5% YoY
+0.2% QoQ
|
+$12.1M |
$386.6M
+1.2% YoY
|
$799.3M
+7.8% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
61% |
| Total Loans ? |
$298.8M
+6.9% YoY
+2.2% QoQ
|
+$40.5M |
$258.3M
+1.7% YoY
|
$538.5M
+5.3% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
67% |
| Total Deposits ? |
$346.0M
+5.5% YoY
-0.1% QoQ
|
+$19.2M |
$326.7M
+0.7% YoY
|
$677.9M
+7.3% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
62% |
| Return on Assets ? |
1.50%
+14.7% YoY
-8.1% QoQ
|
+0.18% |
1.32%
+10.8% YoY
|
1.37%
+23.6% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
65% |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
4.48%
+10.8% YoY
-1.3% QoQ
|
+0.50% |
3.99%
+5.0% YoY
|
4.15%
+0.0% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
79% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
62.90%
-1.7% YoY
+1.4% QoQ
|
-1.58% |
64.48%
-3.2% YoY
|
69.40%
-0.9% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
48% |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
0.82%
-15.5% YoY
+37.3% QoQ
|
-0.10% |
0.92%
+15.7% YoY
|
1.53%
+7.9% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
33% |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
86.38%
+1.3% YoY
+2.3% QoQ
|
+8.43% |
77.95%
+1.0% YoY
|
77.15%
-1.0% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
34% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
29.11%
+0.6% YoY
+0.4% QoQ
|
+7.08% |
22.03%
-0.6% YoY
|
24.65%
+0.5% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
79% |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
0.65%
-7.7% YoY
+36.5% QoQ
|
-0.02% |
0.67%
+16.4% YoY
|
1.11%
+4.1% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
33% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
9.87%
+3.1% YoY
-3.6% QoQ
|
-6.04% |
15.91%
+1.4% YoY
|
17.35%
+5.4% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
Bottom 8.9% in tier |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.11%
-14.1% YoY
+87.9% QoQ
|
-0.45% |
0.57%
+7.6% YoY
|
0.33%
+19.6% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
23% |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
29.1%
+0.2pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
+7.0pp | 22.1% | 24.6% | 22.2% | 79% |
| Brokered Deposits | n/a | n/a | 7.9% | 6.7% | 8.5% | n/a |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
8.9%
+0.4pp YoY +1.4pp QoQ |
-2.7pp | 11.6% | 12.6% | 12.5% | 46% |
| CRE |
48.4%
-0.5pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
+8.9pp | 39.5% | 44.9% | 41.4% | 68% |
| 1-4 Family |
38.9%
+1.8pp YoY -1.2pp QoQ |
+6.3pp | 32.6% | 34.2% | 31.3% | 68% |
| Consumer |
1.3%
-0.2pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
-2.8pp | 4.1% | 4.2% | 5.0% | 36% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio | n/a | n/a | 18.8% | 22.5% | 19.7% | n/a |
| Leverage Ratio |
9.9%
+0.3pp YoY -0.4pp QoQ |
-2.3pp | 12.2% | 13.4% | 12.6% | 28% |
| Total Capital Ratio | n/a | n/a | 19.9% | 23.6% | 20.8% | n/a |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
60
+5 (+9.1%) YoY 0 QoQ |
+1 | 58 | 114 | 482 | 63% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$6.6M
-4.2% YoY +0.2% QoQ |
-$874K | $7.5M | $6.8M | $8.8M | 45% |
| Branch Count |
2
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
-3 | 4 | 9 | 18 | 11% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days |
0.1%
-0.3pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
-0.2pp | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 46% |
| Nonaccrual |
0.7%
+0.1pp YoY +0.2pp QoQ |
-0.2pp | 0.9% | 1.4% | 1.0% | 64% |
| Allowance Coverage |
1.64x
+26.3% YoY -24.1% QoQ |
-22.51x | 24.15x | 27.36x | 20.23x | 42% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
-0.0%
0.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.2pp | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 8% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (LA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
15.3%
+0.7pp YoY -1.2pp QoQ |
+3.1pp | 12.2% | 12.5% | 11.6% | 69% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
1.9%
-0.4pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
+0.2pp | 1.7% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 64% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$2.9M
+16.8% YoY — QoQ |
+$385K | $2.6M | $5.1M | $40.4M | 69% |
Get Full Access to Bank of St. Francisville
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (0)
Concerns (1)
Capital Thin
riskTier 1 capital ratio in the bottom quartile of peers. Capital cushion thin relative to peers - regulator-watching cohort.
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.