BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
Twin Cedars Bank
Bussey, IA
4 branches across IA
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 2,643 banks in the $100M-$1B peer group nationwide — 1 of 167 in IA.
- Deposits +6.0% year over year ($104.7M on the books).
- Delinquency rate 4.75%.
- Return on assets -2.34%.
- Efficiency ratio 108.20% vs a 64.48% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 84.28% vs a 77.95% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
Twin Cedars Bank faces 5 concerns requiring attention
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
No key strengths identified
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Efficiency Drag: Bottom 6.1% in tier
- - NIB Deposit Bleed: Bottom 30.2% in tier
- - Return on Assets 3.66% below tier average
- - Delinquency Rate 3.83% above tier average
- - Nonperforming Asset Ratio 2.87% above tier average
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$118.3M
+4.5% YoY
+1.0% QoQ
|
-$268.2M |
$386.6M
+1.2% YoY
|
$566.2M
+5.8% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
Bottom 5.1% in tier |
| Total Loans ? |
$88.2M
-4.3% YoY
-7.1% QoQ
|
-$170.1M |
$258.3M
+1.7% YoY
|
$385.0M
+5.4% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
Bottom 13.9% in tier |
| Total Deposits ? |
$104.7M
+6.0% YoY
+1.9% QoQ
|
-$222.1M |
$326.7M
+0.7% YoY
|
$472.4M
+6.3% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
Bottom 6.8% in tier |
| Return on Assets ? |
-2.34%
-442.7% YoY
-579.1% QoQ
|
-3.66% |
1.32%
+10.8% YoY
|
1.58%
+39.1% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
Bottom 0.6% in tier |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
3.97%
-12.6% YoY
-1.5% QoQ
|
-0.01% |
3.99%
+5.0% YoY
|
3.58%
+9.0% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
52% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
108.20%
+61.4% YoY
+35.9% QoQ
|
+43.72% |
64.48%
-3.2% YoY
|
57.74%
-6.0% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
Bottom 1.5% in tier |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
4.75%
+141.2% YoY
+11.4% QoQ
|
+3.83% |
0.92%
+15.7% YoY
|
0.99%
+12.8% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
Bottom 2.8% in tier |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
84.28%
-9.8% YoY
-8.8% QoQ
|
+6.32% |
77.95%
+1.0% YoY
|
80.39%
+2.7% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
40% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
12.16%
-20.6% YoY
-3.9% QoQ
|
-9.87% |
22.03%
-0.6% YoY
|
17.72%
+0.8% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
Bottom 14.9% in tier |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
3.54%
+121.3% YoY
+2.5% QoQ
|
+2.87% |
0.67%
+16.4% YoY
|
0.63%
+7.9% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
Bottom 2.2% in tier |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
12.94%
-6.6% YoY
-4.5% QoQ
|
-2.97% |
15.91%
+1.4% YoY
|
14.69%
+3.0% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
47% |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.08%
-23.8% YoY
+85.7% QoQ
|
-0.49% |
0.57%
+7.6% YoY
|
0.24%
+5.5% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
Bottom 11.5% in tier |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
12.2%
-3.1pp YoY -0.5pp QoQ |
-10.0pp | 22.1% | 17.8% | 22.2% | 14% |
| Brokered Deposits | n/a | n/a | 7.9% | 6.0% | 8.5% | n/a |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
20.8%
-2.7pp YoY -3.2pp QoQ |
+9.2pp | 11.6% | 12.8% | 12.5% | 89% |
| CRE |
35.0%
+5.8pp YoY +1.9pp QoQ |
-4.5pp | 39.5% | 28.3% | 41.4% | 43% |
| 1-4 Family |
31.0%
+0.7pp YoY +1.5pp QoQ |
-1.7pp | 32.6% | 23.0% | 31.3% | 54% |
| Consumer |
1.2%
-0.5pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-2.9pp | 4.1% | 2.9% | 5.0% | 34% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio |
12.9%
-0.9pp YoY -0.6pp QoQ |
-5.9pp | 18.8% | 15.4% | 19.7% | 27% |
| Leverage Ratio |
9.2%
-2.2pp YoY -1.6pp QoQ |
-3.0pp | 12.2% | 12.4% | 12.6% | 15% |
| Total Capital Ratio |
14.2%
-0.9pp YoY -0.6pp QoQ |
-5.7pp | 19.9% | 16.5% | 20.8% | 29% |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
21
+2 (+10.5%) YoY +1 (+5.0%) QoQ |
-38 | 58 | 64 | 482 | 12% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$5.6M
-5.5% YoY -3.8% QoQ |
-$1.9M | $7.5M | $8.9M | $8.8M | 26% |
| Branch Count |
4
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
-1 | 4 | 5 | 18 | 42% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days |
0.6%
-0.5pp YoY +0.3pp QoQ |
+0.3pp | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 86% |
| Nonaccrual |
4.1%
+3.3pp YoY +0.2pp QoQ |
+3.2pp | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 97% |
| Allowance Coverage |
0.63x
-38.9% YoY +22.9% QoQ |
-23.53x | 24.15x | 18.97x | 20.23x | 15% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
1.8%
+1.7pp YoY +1.0pp QoQ |
+1.7pp | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 99% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
-20.9%
-26.5pp YoY -17.8pp QoQ |
-33.1pp | 12.2% | 12.8% | 11.6% | 0% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
2.7%
-0.1pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
+1.0pp | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 94% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$-1394000.0
-467.8% YoY — QoQ |
-$3.9M | $2.6M | $4.0M | $40.4M | 1% |
Get Full Access to Twin Cedars Bank
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (0)
Concerns (2)
Efficiency Drag
riskEfficiency ratio above 80% - operating costs elevated relative to revenue. Margin improvement opportunity.
NIB Deposit Bleed
declineNon-interest-bearing deposit share dropped 2+ pp YoY and now below the tier median. Cheap funding leaving for higher-yield competitors.
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.