BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
The Shelby County State Bank
Harlan, IA
11 branches across IA
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 2,643 banks in the $100M-$1B peer group nationwide — 1 of 167 in IA.
- Deposits +0.6% year over year ($462.9M on the books).
- Delinquency rate 0.41%.
- Return on assets 1.43%.
- Efficiency ratio 54.30% vs a 64.48% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 74.87% vs a 77.95% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
The Shelby County State Bank has 3 strengths but faces 1 concern
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + ROA 0.11% above tier average
- + Efficiency Ratio 10.17% below tier average
- + Delinquency Rate 0.51% below tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Flatlined Growth: Bottom 49.7% in tier
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$523.6M
-1.2% YoY
-3.0% QoQ
|
+$137.0M |
$386.6M
+1.2% YoY
|
$566.2M
+5.8% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
74% |
| Total Loans ? |
$346.6M
-5.7% YoY
-2.1% QoQ
|
+$88.3M |
$258.3M
+1.7% YoY
|
$385.0M
+5.4% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
74% |
| Total Deposits ? |
$462.9M
+0.6% YoY
-3.5% QoQ
|
+$136.2M |
$326.7M
+0.7% YoY
|
$472.4M
+6.3% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
76% |
| Return on Assets ? |
1.43%
+16.7% YoY
+4.8% QoQ
|
+0.11% |
1.32%
+10.8% YoY
|
1.58%
+39.1% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
62% |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
3.99%
+9.8% YoY
+3.0% QoQ
|
+0.00% |
3.99%
+5.0% YoY
|
3.58%
+9.0% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
53% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
54.30%
-1.5% YoY
-1.0% QoQ
|
-10.17% |
64.48%
-3.2% YoY
|
57.74%
-6.0% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
74% |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
0.41%
-65.4% YoY
-34.4% QoQ
|
-0.51% |
0.92%
+15.7% YoY
|
0.99%
+12.8% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
51% |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
74.87%
-6.3% YoY
+1.5% QoQ
|
-3.08% |
77.95%
+1.0% YoY
|
80.39%
+2.7% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
60% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
26.00%
+2.8% YoY
+0.9% QoQ
|
+3.97% |
22.03%
-0.6% YoY
|
17.72%
+0.8% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
70% |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
0.27%
-67.0% YoY
-33.8% QoQ
|
-0.40% |
0.67%
+16.4% YoY
|
0.63%
+7.9% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
54% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
13.64%
+8.5% YoY
+3.0% QoQ
|
-2.26% |
15.91%
+1.4% YoY
|
14.69%
+3.0% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
54% |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.24%
+24.4% YoY
+106.4% QoQ
|
-0.33% |
0.57%
+7.6% YoY
|
0.24%
+5.5% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
61% |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
26.0%
+0.7pp YoY +0.2pp QoQ |
+3.8pp | 22.1% | 17.8% | 22.2% | 69% |
| Brokered Deposits | n/a | n/a | 7.9% | 6.0% | 8.5% | n/a |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
7.6%
-0.3pp YoY +0.3pp QoQ |
-4.0pp | 11.6% | 12.8% | 12.5% | 37% |
| CRE | n/a | n/a | 39.5% | 28.3% | 41.4% | n/a |
| 1-4 Family |
15.1%
+2.1pp YoY +1.0pp QoQ |
-17.5pp | 32.6% | 23.0% | 31.3% | 19% |
| Consumer |
3.5%
+0.1pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
-0.6pp | 4.1% | 2.9% | 5.0% | 65% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio |
13.6%
+1.1pp YoY +0.4pp QoQ |
-5.2pp | 18.8% | 15.4% | 19.7% | 35% |
| Leverage Ratio |
10.0%
+0.4pp YoY +0.2pp QoQ |
-2.2pp | 12.2% | 12.4% | 12.6% | 31% |
| Total Capital Ratio |
14.8%
+1.2pp YoY +0.4pp QoQ |
-5.1pp | 19.9% | 16.5% | 20.8% | 36% |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
84
+6 (+7.7%) YoY +3 (+3.7%) QoQ |
+25 | 58 | 64 | 482 | 79% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$6.2M
-8.2% YoY -6.5% QoQ |
-$1.3M | $7.5M | $8.9M | $8.8M | 38% |
| Branch Count |
11
-3 (-21.4%) YoY -3 (-21.4%) QoQ |
+6 | 4 | 5 | 18 | 93% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days |
0.0%
-1.0pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-0.3pp | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 22% |
| Nonaccrual |
0.4%
+0.2pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-0.5pp | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 46% |
| Allowance Coverage |
3.15x
+213.0% YoY +55.5% QoQ |
-21.01x | 24.15x | 18.97x | 20.23x | 60% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
0.0%
0.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.1pp | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | 64% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (IA) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
13.0%
+1.1pp YoY +0.5pp QoQ |
+0.8pp | 12.2% | 12.8% | 11.6% | 56% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
1.2%
-0.2pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.5pp | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 21% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$3.8M
+14.9% YoY — QoQ |
+$1.3M | $2.6M | $4.0M | $40.4M | 78% |
Get Full Access to The Shelby County State Bank
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (0)
Concerns (1)
Flatlined Growth
riskAsset growth stalled (-2% to +2% YoY) despite healthy profitability (>0.25% ROA). Suggests untapped opportunity or strategic drift worth investigating.
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.