BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
Frandsen Bank & Trust
Lonsdale, MN
40 branches across MN · WI · ND · SD
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 885 banks in the $1B-$10B peer group nationwide — 1 of 17 in MN.
- Deposits +2.8% year over year ($3.1B on the books).
- Delinquency rate 0.72%.
- Return on assets 1.82%.
- Efficiency ratio 54.07% vs a 59.73% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 79.53% vs a 85.04% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
Frandsen Bank & Trust demonstrates 4 strengths
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + Profitability Leader: Top 49.5% in tier
- + Net Interest Margin 0.34% above tier average
- + Efficiency Ratio 5.65% below tier average
- + Delinquency Rate 0.15% below tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
No key concerns identified
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$3.7B
+2.6% YoY
-0.8% QoQ
|
+$863.6M |
$2.8B
-0.6% YoY
|
$524.5M
+5.8% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
78% |
| Total Loans ? |
$2.5B
-0.0% YoY
+0.8% QoQ
|
+$527.1M |
$2.0B
-0.3% YoY
|
$300.2M
+7.3% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
77% |
| Total Deposits ? |
$3.1B
+2.8% YoY
-0.2% QoQ
|
+$812.6M |
$2.3B
-0.5% YoY
|
$452.1M
+5.5% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
79% |
| Return on Assets ? |
1.82%
+21.7% YoY
+11.5% QoQ
|
+0.42% |
1.39%
+17.0% YoY
|
1.26%
+17.2% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
83% |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
4.21%
+8.9% YoY
+5.6% QoQ
|
+0.34% |
3.87%
+6.2% YoY
|
4.00%
+6.8% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
77% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
54.07%
-5.6% YoY
-2.8% QoQ
|
-5.65% |
59.73%
-12.6% YoY
|
63.00%
-3.5% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
65% |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
0.72%
-13.7% YoY
-37.8% QoQ
|
-0.15% |
0.87%
+11.7% YoY
|
1.01%
+19.3% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
38% |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
79.53%
-2.7% YoY
+1.1% QoQ
|
-5.51% |
85.04%
-0.1% YoY
|
78.29%
-0.6% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
69% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
23.93%
+0.7% YoY
+0.3% QoQ
|
+2.66% |
21.27%
-1.5% YoY
|
21.79%
+0.9% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
68% |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
0.70%
+20.0% YoY
-28.7% QoQ
|
+0.02% |
0.67%
+11.7% YoY
|
0.76%
+16.9% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
33% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
13.89%
+12.4% YoY
+2.0% QoQ
|
-0.96% |
14.84%
-0.4% YoY
|
15.35%
-0.4% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
62% |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.41%
+11.9% YoY
+115.2% QoQ
|
-0.11% |
0.53%
+2.5% YoY
|
0.31%
+3.9% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
72% |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
23.9%
+0.2pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
+2.6pp | 21.4% | 21.9% | 22.2% | 67% |
| Brokered Deposits | n/a | n/a | 9.5% | 8.3% | 8.5% | n/a |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
12.4%
-0.7pp YoY -0.2pp QoQ |
-1.6pp | 14.0% | 14.6% | 12.5% | 56% |
| CRE |
39.4%
-0.6pp YoY -0.6pp QoQ |
-10.6pp | 50.0% | 36.5% | 41.4% | 23% |
| 1-4 Family |
30.6%
+0.5pp YoY +0.6pp QoQ |
+4.2pp | 26.4% | 29.4% | 31.3% | 67% |
| Consumer |
2.6%
-0.3pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-2.1pp | 4.7% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 71% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio |
13.9%
+1.5pp YoY +0.3pp QoQ |
-1.7pp | 15.6% | 16.5% | 19.7% | 56% |
| Leverage Ratio |
10.0%
+0.9pp YoY +0.3pp QoQ |
-1.3pp | 11.3% | 11.0% | 12.6% | 37% |
| Total Capital Ratio |
15.1%
+1.5pp YoY +0.3pp QoQ |
-1.6pp | 16.7% | 17.6% | 20.8% | 58% |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
455
-3 (-0.7%) YoY +7 (+1.6%) QoQ |
+141 | 313 | 55 | 482 | 82% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$8.0M
+3.3% YoY -2.4% QoQ |
-$2.4M | $10.5M | $8.6M | $8.8M | 40% |
| Branch Count |
40
+1 (+2.6%) YoY 0 QoQ |
+20 | 20 | 4 | 18 | 90% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days |
0.1%
+0.1pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
-0.1pp | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 73% |
| Nonaccrual |
0.6%
-0.2pp YoY -0.5pp QoQ |
-0.2pp | 0.8% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 59% |
| Allowance Coverage |
1.86x
+11.2% YoY +59.7% QoQ |
-16.85x | 18.71x | 20.41x | 20.23x | 46% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
0.1%
+0.1pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
-0.2pp | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 69% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (MN) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
15.7%
+1.0pp YoY +1.5pp QoQ |
+3.1pp | 12.6% | 13.1% | 11.6% | 78% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
1.5%
-0.2pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.4pp | 1.9% | 1.7% | 1.7% | 23% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$33.4M
+25.5% YoY — QoQ |
+$14.2M | $19.2M | $4.5M | $40.4M | 84% |
Get Full Access to Frandsen Bank & Trust
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (1)
Profitability Leader
growthTop-quartile profitability for peers of this size. Strong fundamentals and operational efficiency.
Concerns (0)
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.