BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
Farmers Savings Bank
Mineral Point, WI
5 branches across WI
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 2,643 banks in the $100M-$1B peer group nationwide — 1 of 110 in WI.
- Deposits +5.2% year over year ($404.0M on the books).
- Delinquency rate 0.05%.
- Return on assets 1.75%.
- Efficiency ratio 52.85% vs a 64.48% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 56.63% vs a 77.95% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
Farmers Savings Bank has 3 strengths but faces 1 concern
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + Profitability Leader: Top 35.4% in tier
- + Efficiency Ratio 11.63% below tier average
- + Delinquency Rate 0.87% below tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Net Interest Margin 0.94% below tier average
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (WI) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$461.2M
+6.6% YoY
+0.7% QoQ
|
+$74.6M |
$386.6M
+1.2% YoY
|
$1.2B
+13.5% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
68% |
| Total Loans ? |
$228.8M
+7.3% YoY
-1.5% QoQ
|
-$29.5M |
$258.3M
+1.7% YoY
|
$860.4M
+13.3% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
54% |
| Total Deposits ? |
$404.0M
+5.2% YoY
-0.5% QoQ
|
+$77.3M |
$326.7M
+0.7% YoY
|
$935.5M
+13.1% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
70% |
| Return on Assets ? |
1.75%
+37.9% YoY
+22.9% QoQ
|
+0.43% |
1.32%
+10.8% YoY
|
1.56%
+18.6% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
78% |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
3.05%
+0.4% YoY
+2.3% QoQ
|
-0.94% |
3.99%
+5.0% YoY
|
3.83%
+8.5% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
Bottom 11.2% in tier |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
52.85%
-12.8% YoY
-6.8% QoQ
|
-11.63% |
64.48%
-3.2% YoY
|
62.90%
-5.1% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
77% |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
0.05%
-92.0% YoY
+1.5% QoQ
|
-0.87% |
0.92%
+15.7% YoY
|
0.85%
+12.5% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
80% |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
56.63%
+2.0% YoY
-1.0% QoQ
|
-21.32% |
77.95%
+1.0% YoY
|
87.22%
+0.9% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
Top 14.0% in tier |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
21.75%
-8.3% YoY
-0.4% QoQ
|
-0.28% |
22.03%
-0.6% YoY
|
18.65%
-1.9% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
53% |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
0.02%
-92.0% YoY
-0.7% QoQ
|
-0.65% |
0.67%
+16.4% YoY
|
0.63%
+16.4% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
83% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
20.06%
+18.8% YoY
+10.1% QoQ
|
+4.15% |
15.91%
+1.4% YoY
|
15.02%
+1.5% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
Top 13.5% in tier |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.24%
+3.5% YoY
+115.0% QoQ
|
-0.32% |
0.57%
+7.6% YoY
|
2.21%
+12.7% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
62% |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (WI) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
21.7%
-2.0pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-0.4pp | 22.1% | 18.9% | 22.2% | 53% |
| Brokered Deposits |
0.2%
0.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-7.6pp | 7.9% | 9.2% | 8.5% | 8% |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (WI) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
14.6%
+1.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
+3.0pp | 11.6% | 10.5% | 12.5% | 74% |
| CRE |
36.8%
+2.2pp YoY +0.3pp QoQ |
-2.7pp | 39.5% | 46.4% | 41.4% | 47% |
| 1-4 Family |
28.8%
+1.9pp YoY +2.2pp QoQ |
-3.9pp | 32.6% | 32.3% | 31.3% | 48% |
| Consumer |
2.7%
-0.7pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-1.4pp | 4.1% | 2.6% | 5.0% | 56% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (WI) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio |
20.1%
+3.2pp YoY +1.8pp QoQ |
+1.2pp | 18.8% | 15.5% | 19.7% | 78% |
| Leverage Ratio |
11.2%
+0.6pp YoY +0.3pp QoQ |
-0.9pp | 12.2% | 12.6% | 12.6% | 54% |
| Total Capital Ratio |
21.1%
+3.1pp YoY +1.8pp QoQ |
+1.1pp | 19.9% | 16.6% | 20.8% | 78% |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (WI) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
56
-3 (-5.1%) YoY 0 QoQ |
-3 | 58 | 134 | 482 | 60% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$8.2M
+12.4% YoY +0.7% QoQ |
+$717K | $7.5M | $8.2M | $8.8M | 71% |
| Branch Count |
5
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
0 | 4 | 9 | 18 | 55% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (WI) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days | n/a | n/a | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.4% | n/a |
| Nonaccrual |
0.0%
-0.5pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.9pp | 0.9% | 0.9% | 1.0% | 11% |
| Allowance Coverage |
21.85x
+997.8% YoY -7.7% QoQ |
-2.30x | 24.15x | 56.89x | 20.23x | 89% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
0.0%
0.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.1pp | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.2% | 43% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (WI) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
16.5%
+2.9pp YoY +3.0pp QoQ |
+4.3pp | 12.2% | 11.8% | 11.6% | 75% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
1.8%
+0.1pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
+0.1pp | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 58% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$4.0M
+47.4% YoY — QoQ |
+$1.4M | $2.6M | $7.9M | $40.4M | 80% |
Get Full Access to Farmers Savings Bank
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (1)
Profitability Leader
growthTop-quartile profitability for peers of this size. Strong fundamentals and operational efficiency.
Concerns (0)
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.