BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
Dominion Bank
Dallas, TX
5 branches across TX
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 2,643 banks in the $100M-$1B peer group nationwide — 1 of 219 in TX.
- Deposits +3.0% year over year ($569.9M on the books).
- Delinquency rate 0.73%.
- Return on assets 0.95%.
- Efficiency ratio 62.68% vs a 64.48% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 88.28% vs a 77.95% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
Dominion Bank has 2 strengths but faces 4 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + Efficiency Ratio 1.80% below tier average
- + Delinquency Rate 0.18% below tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - NIB Deposit Bleed: Bottom 14.8% in tier
- - Non-Interest Income / Assets 0.51% below tier average
- - ROA 0.37% below tier average
- - Net Interest Margin 0.73% below tier average
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TX) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$647.4M
+3.7% YoY
+1.9% QoQ
|
+$260.8M |
$386.6M
+1.2% YoY
|
$2.3B
+5.2% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
84% |
| Total Loans ? |
$503.1M
-4.2% YoY
-7.0% QoQ
|
+$244.8M |
$258.3M
+1.7% YoY
|
$1.1B
+11.2% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
Top 11.1% in tier |
| Total Deposits ? |
$569.9M
+3.0% YoY
+1.9% QoQ
|
+$243.2M |
$326.7M
+0.7% YoY
|
$2.0B
+7.3% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
Top 14.5% in tier |
| Return on Assets ? |
0.95%
+6.9% YoY
+18.8% QoQ
|
-0.37% |
1.32%
+10.8% YoY
|
1.27%
-5.3% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
31% |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
3.26%
-6.2% YoY
+0.7% QoQ
|
-0.73% |
3.99%
+5.0% YoY
|
4.08%
+2.2% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
18% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
62.68%
-0.4% YoY
-3.5% QoQ
|
-1.80% |
64.48%
-3.2% YoY
|
90.57%
+43.9% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
49% |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
0.73%
+6.8% QoQ
|
-0.18% |
0.92%
+15.7% YoY
|
0.94%
+18.8% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
36% |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
88.28%
-7.0% YoY
-8.8% QoQ
|
+10.33% |
77.95%
+1.0% YoY
|
67.96%
-1.3% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
30% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
13.30%
-28.0% YoY
-17.4% QoQ
|
-8.73% |
22.03%
-0.6% YoY
|
29.12%
-0.7% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
18% |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
0.57%
-2.6% QoQ
|
-0.10% |
0.67%
+16.4% YoY
|
0.64%
+15.8% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
36% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
13.08%
+13.3% YoY
+9.6% QoQ
|
-2.83% |
15.91%
+1.4% YoY
|
18.23%
+1.1% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
49% |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.06%
-3.6% YoY
+250.5% QoQ
|
-0.51% |
0.57%
+7.6% YoY
|
0.40%
+1.2% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
Bottom 7.0% in tier |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TX) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
13.3%
-5.2pp YoY -2.8pp QoQ |
-8.9pp | 22.1% | 29.2% | 22.2% | 18% |
| Brokered Deposits | n/a | n/a | 7.9% | 8.0% | 8.5% | n/a |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TX) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
34.9%
-1.6pp YoY -0.8pp QoQ |
+23.3pp | 11.6% | 14.8% | 12.5% | 97% |
| CRE |
60.0%
+0.1pp YoY +0.4pp QoQ |
+20.4pp | 39.5% | 48.4% | 41.4% | 84% |
| 1-4 Family |
4.9%
+1.4pp YoY +0.3pp QoQ |
-27.7pp | 32.6% | 25.8% | 31.3% | 5% |
| Consumer |
0.2%
0.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-3.9pp | 4.1% | 4.7% | 5.0% | 9% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TX) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio |
13.1%
+1.5pp YoY +1.2pp QoQ |
-5.7pp | 18.8% | 22.7% | 19.7% | 29% |
| Leverage Ratio |
11.2%
+0.3pp YoY +0.3pp QoQ |
-1.0pp | 12.2% | 12.6% | 12.6% | 53% |
| Total Capital Ratio |
14.0%
+1.7pp YoY +1.2pp QoQ |
-5.9pp | 19.9% | 23.8% | 20.8% | 26% |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TX) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
46
-2 (-4.2%) YoY -2 (-4.2%) QoQ |
-13 | 58 | 186 | 482 | 48% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$14.1M
+8.2% YoY +6.3% QoQ |
+$6.6M | $7.5M | $10.1M | $8.8M | 96% |
| Branch Count |
5
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
0 | 4 | 12 | 18 | 55% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TX) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days | n/a | n/a | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.4% | n/a |
| Nonaccrual |
0.7%
0.0pp QoQ |
-0.2pp | 0.9% | 1.0% | 1.0% | 64% |
| Allowance Coverage |
1.33x
-1.8% QoQ |
-22.82x | 24.15x | 18.82x | 20.23x | 36% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) | n/a | n/a | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.2% | n/a |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (TX) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
8.8%
+0.6pp YoY +1.3pp QoQ |
-3.4pp | 12.2% | 13.2% | 11.6% | 30% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
2.6%
-0.4pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
+0.9pp | 1.7% | 1.6% | 1.7% | 92% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$3.1M
+17.6% YoY — QoQ |
+$537K | $2.6M | $15.9M | $40.4M | 71% |
Get Full Access to Dominion Bank
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (0)
Concerns (1)
NIB Deposit Bleed
declineNon-interest-bearing deposit share dropped 2+ pp YoY and now below the tier median. Cheap funding leaving for higher-yield competitors.
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.