BlastPoint's Banking Scorecard
Mabrey Bank
Designations: ✓ Community bank
Bixby, OK
16 branches across OK
NEW · Q2 2026 RECAP
Your Quarter, Wrapped
A 35-second highlight reel of your Q2 — the wins worth celebrating and the one signal worth watching, pulled straight from your scorecard data.
Q2 2026 at a glance
- 1 of 885 banks in the $1B-$10B peer group nationwide — 1 of 21 in OK.
- Deposits +2.0% year over year ($1.6B on the books).
- Delinquency rate 0.42%.
- Return on assets 1.23%.
- Efficiency ratio 58.07% vs a 59.73% peer average.
- Loan-to-deposit ratio 93.41% vs a 85.04% peer average.
Animation disabled (reduced-motion preference). Full details in the Core Metrics table below.
Mabrey Bank has 3 strengths but faces 2 concerns
Key Strengths
Areas where this bank excels compared to peers
- + Net Interest Margin 0.13% above tier average
- + Efficiency Ratio 1.66% below tier average
- + Delinquency Rate 0.45% below tier average
Key Concerns
Areas that may need attention
- - Capital Thin: Bottom 50.0% in tier
- - ROA 0.16% below tier average
Core Metrics
As of 2026-Q2
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Assets ? |
$2.0B
+7.3% YoY
+1.4% QoQ
|
-$771.5M |
$2.8B
-0.6% YoY
|
$1.3B
+6.0% YoY
|
$6.3B
+7.7% YoY
|
51% |
| Total Loans ? |
$1.5B
+12.7% YoY
+3.7% QoQ
|
-$426.3M |
$2.0B
-0.3% YoY
|
$835.5M
+7.1% YoY
|
$3.2B
+9.4% YoY
|
54% |
| Total Deposits ? |
$1.6B
+2.0% YoY
-2.3% QoQ
|
-$673.4M |
$2.3B
-0.5% YoY
|
$967.8M
+5.8% YoY
|
$4.9B
+7.3% YoY
|
49% |
| Return on Assets ? |
1.23%
+20.9% YoY
+0.8% QoQ
|
-0.16% |
1.39%
+17.0% YoY
|
1.35%
+7.7% YoY
|
1.30%
+12.1% YoY
|
47% |
| Net Interest Margin ? |
4.00%
+7.2% YoY
+1.9% QoQ
|
+0.13% |
3.87%
+6.2% YoY
|
4.27%
+1.9% YoY
|
3.95%
+4.9% YoY
|
68% |
| Efficiency Ratio ? |
58.07%
-9.6% YoY
-0.5% QoQ
|
-1.66% |
59.73%
-12.6% YoY
|
64.81%
-3.0% YoY
|
70.05%
+2.5% YoY
|
54% |
| Delinquency Rate ? |
0.42%
-21.7% YoY
-2.6% QoQ
|
-0.45% |
0.87%
+11.7% YoY
|
1.78%
+23.7% YoY
|
0.98%
+16.3% YoY
|
59% |
| Loan-to-Deposit Ratio ? |
93.41%
+10.5% YoY
+6.2% QoQ
|
+8.37% |
85.04%
-0.1% YoY
|
74.14%
+1.3% YoY
|
79.03%
+2.3% YoY
|
31% |
| Non-Interest-Bearing Deposit Share ? |
19.82%
-0.1% YoY
-4.8% QoQ
|
-1.46% |
21.27%
-1.5% YoY
|
23.91%
-1.8% YoY
|
21.98%
-0.6% YoY
|
50% |
| Nonperforming Asset Ratio ? |
0.32%
-17.8% YoY
-0.3% QoQ
|
-0.36% |
0.67%
+11.7% YoY
|
1.24%
+23.1% YoY
|
0.69%
+15.8% YoY
|
60% |
| Tier 1 Capital Ratio ? |
10.79%
-1.8% YoY
-1.6% QoQ
|
-4.05% |
14.84%
-0.4% YoY
|
14.18%
-3.9% YoY
|
17.09%
+0.8% YoY
|
Bottom 14.8% in tier |
| Non-Interest Income / Assets ? |
0.24%
-17.6% YoY
+84.1% QoQ
|
-0.29% |
0.53%
+2.5% YoY
|
0.31%
-11.7% YoY
|
0.66%
+5.2% YoY
|
39% |
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Additional Detail
Deposit mix, loan mix, capital, efficiency, asset quality & profitability · As of 2026-Q2
Deposit Composition
% of total deposits
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noninterest-Bearing |
19.8%
0.0pp YoY -1.0pp QoQ |
-1.6pp | 21.4% | 23.9% | 22.2% | 50% |
| Brokered Deposits |
1.7%
0.0pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-7.7pp | 9.5% | 9.7% | 8.5% | 25% |
Loan Composition
% of total loans & leases
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C&I |
19.9%
-1.3pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
+5.9pp | 14.0% | 15.7% | 12.5% | 80% |
| CRE |
49.5%
+4.8pp YoY +0.7pp QoQ |
-0.5pp | 50.0% | 42.0% | 41.4% | 48% |
| 1-4 Family |
25.0%
-2.6pp YoY -0.5pp QoQ |
-1.4pp | 26.4% | 24.0% | 31.3% | 55% |
| Consumer |
1.4%
-0.3pp YoY -0.1pp QoQ |
-3.3pp | 4.7% | 5.6% | 5.0% | 54% |
Capital
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CET1 Ratio |
10.8%
-0.2pp YoY -0.2pp QoQ |
-4.8pp | 15.6% | 17.0% | 19.7% | 6% |
| Leverage Ratio |
8.5%
+0.3pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-2.8pp | 11.3% | 11.7% | 12.6% | 5% |
| Total Capital Ratio |
11.9%
-0.1pp YoY -0.2pp QoQ |
-4.7pp | 16.7% | 18.2% | 20.8% | 8% |
Efficiency & Staffing
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full-Time Employees |
240
+12 (+5.3%) YoY +3 (+1.3%) QoQ |
-74 | 313 | 150 | 482 | 52% |
| Assets per Employee ($) |
$8.4M
+2.0% YoY +0.1% QoQ |
-$2.1M | $10.5M | $6.5M | $8.8M | 47% |
| Branch Count |
16
0 YoY 0 QoQ |
-4 | 20 | 8 | 18 | 53% |
Asset Quality
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Past Due 90+ Days | n/a | n/a | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.4% | n/a |
| Nonaccrual |
0.4%
-0.1pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.4pp | 0.8% | 1.5% | 1.0% | 42% |
| Allowance Coverage |
2.81x
+30.8% YoY +3.6% QoQ |
-15.90x | 18.71x | 61.99x | 20.23x | 60% |
| Net Charge-off Rate (YTD) |
0.0%
0.0pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
-0.3pp | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 30% |
Profitability
| Metric | Current | vs Tier | Tier Avg | State Avg (OK) | National Avg | Tier Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE |
17.6%
+1.2pp YoY 0.0pp QoQ |
+5.0pp | 12.6% | 11.9% | 11.6% | 85% |
| Cost of Funds (YTD) |
1.8%
-0.3pp YoY +0.1pp QoQ |
-0.1pp | 1.9% | 1.8% | 1.7% | 42% |
| Net Income ($, YTD) |
$12.3M
+28.9% YoY — QoQ |
-$7.0M | $19.2M | $8.7M | $40.4M | 50% |
Get Full Access to Mabrey Bank
Unlock complete metrics, peer benchmarks, and signature insights for this and every other FDIC-insured bank - always free
Check your email at - link expires in 72 hours
Want to see an example first? Preview JPMorgan Chase's scorecard →
Signature Analysis
Composite behavioral patterns that combine multiple metrics to identify what stands out about this bank. Matched signatures only; metric-level callouts appear in the Key Strengths / Key Concerns summary above.
Strengths (0)
Concerns (1)
Capital Thin
riskTier 1 capital ratio in the bottom quartile of peers. Capital cushion thin relative to peers - regulator-watching cohort.
Metric Rankings
See how this bank ranks across all tracked metrics compared to peers.